"We sent out more than 1,000 invitations, but not a business or individual willing to respond to our reporter from Guizhou Provincial Department of Education under the branches - Guizhou Province Education Development Foundation learned that, since its inception in June 30, 2011 The fund suffered "donor" embarrassment, issued more than a thousand invitations no one responded. (October 21, Xiaoxiang Morning ")
The Foundation will undoubtedly set a Guinness embarrassing: for nearly a year and a half, more than a thousand copies of an invitation, but no one enterprise or individual to respond. Any of you is a multi-talented director, I am afraid to imagine not so "funny" plot ". Cold humor behind the social phenomenon that reflects how much more painful to me!
Charity, is the world, both ancient and popular thinking and behavior, external outpouring of universal human values, is a recognized as social civilization, common for all mankind. Shelley said: "charitable tendencies inherent in the human mind, we are driven to seek benefits for others, we do to make people happy thing after total satisfied" Shakespeare said: "There is no compassion is a beast Savage, is the devil. "compassion for the weak, the economic crisis problem solving is that people generally should have a state of mind. However, whether it is business or personal, the public for the fundraising has chosen a "collective blindness. The face of such a "farce", we can not help but have this doubt: It had been benevolent, positive energy helpfulness time to spend nothing you? Are we really as Shakespeare put it - just like beasts, savages, the devil? The answer of course is no. In fact, China is a Confucian, Buddhist thought is extremely prevalent countries, regardless of the Confucian "could not bear to Heart line unbearing governance", "little children" or the Buddhist salvation "," doing good deeds can be obtained afterlife retribution ", preached a philosophy of life one should do more good. Chinese people has always been no shortage of love, the past is the future.
That being the case, why will zero donors such an embarrassing phenomenon it? I believe that, The Roots the public seriously questioned the credibility of the charity organizations today. "Mei-US incident" occurred shortly after the scandal of a charity to buy luxury cars, but also sudden. Under such an environment, the public will inevitably produce the feeling of conscience to be "trafficking". Imagine, If you have donated their hard-earned hard-earned money, this money does not fall into the hands of the vulnerable groups in need of help, but as some institutions props, or personal Xianbai or abuse of power, would you feel? Needless to say, you will have huge charitable donations "immunity" conditioned reflex you would suspect, "This time I donated this will not again be the name of fundraising under the banner, and the line to the the consumer conscience of real ? "
We note that the Foundation Secretary-General expressed the hope that the public will not charity, "a stick and killed. Credibility is a foothold in this modern society, and the action is to eliminate doubt the best cleaners. I believe that the parties concerned with its appeal to the mind spending above better practically action, efforts needed to train their own "internal strength", start now, start small, focus on improving the institutional credibility, to further strengthen public institutions supervision mechanism, establish and improve the use of donations hearing system, the care of a good sum of money, well spent, with value, in order to reshape the institutions themselves a good image, and re-unite the confidence of the public has been depleted. The only way to move forward with ease, charity magnificent turn.
The Foundation will undoubtedly set a Guinness embarrassing: for nearly a year and a half, more than a thousand copies of an invitation, but no one enterprise or individual to respond. Any of you is a multi-talented director, I am afraid to imagine not so "funny" plot ". Cold humor behind the social phenomenon that reflects how much more painful to me!
Charity, is the world, both ancient and popular thinking and behavior, external outpouring of universal human values, is a recognized as social civilization, common for all mankind. Shelley said: "charitable tendencies inherent in the human mind, we are driven to seek benefits for others, we do to make people happy thing after total satisfied" Shakespeare said: "There is no compassion is a beast Savage, is the devil. "compassion for the weak, the economic crisis problem solving is that people generally should have a state of mind. However, whether it is business or personal, the public for the fundraising has chosen a "collective blindness. The face of such a "farce", we can not help but have this doubt: It had been benevolent, positive energy helpfulness time to spend nothing you? Are we really as Shakespeare put it - just like beasts, savages, the devil? The answer of course is no. In fact, China is a Confucian, Buddhist thought is extremely prevalent countries, regardless of the Confucian "could not bear to Heart line unbearing governance", "little children" or the Buddhist salvation "," doing good deeds can be obtained afterlife retribution ", preached a philosophy of life one should do more good. Chinese people has always been no shortage of love, the past is the future.
That being the case, why will zero donors such an embarrassing phenomenon it? I believe that, The Roots the public seriously questioned the credibility of the charity organizations today. "Mei-US incident" occurred shortly after the scandal of a charity to buy luxury cars, but also sudden. Under such an environment, the public will inevitably produce the feeling of conscience to be "trafficking". Imagine, If you have donated their hard-earned hard-earned money, this money does not fall into the hands of the vulnerable groups in need of help, but as some institutions props, or personal Xianbai or abuse of power, would you feel? Needless to say, you will have huge charitable donations "immunity" conditioned reflex you would suspect, "This time I donated this will not again be the name of fundraising under the banner, and the line to the the consumer conscience of real ? "
We note that the Foundation Secretary-General expressed the hope that the public will not charity, "a stick and killed. Credibility is a foothold in this modern society, and the action is to eliminate doubt the best cleaners. I believe that the parties concerned with its appeal to the mind spending above better practically action, efforts needed to train their own "internal strength", start now, start small, focus on improving the institutional credibility, to further strengthen public institutions supervision mechanism, establish and improve the use of donations hearing system, the care of a good sum of money, well spent, with value, in order to reshape the institutions themselves a good image, and re-unite the confidence of the public has been depleted. The only way to move forward with ease, charity magnificent turn.
没有评论:
发表评论